Court of Protection Disputes
Where a person lacks capacity to make decisions about their own health and welfare or property and affairs, a decision must be made in their best interests.
Common disputes in the Court of Protection include:
A person must be assumed to have capacity to make their own decisions unless it has been shown that they lack capacity around a certain issue. Capacity is specific to both the decision at hand and the time that the decision is being made. There may be a dispute about whether a person can make a decision for themselves. It may therefore fall to the Court to consider the capacity assessments and opinions and make declarations about capacity.
In some cases a person may be thought to lack capacity to make a decision but actually they just need the right assistance, e.g. help to understand the relevant information or to communicate their decision.
Only once a person is found to lack the capacity to make a decision can that decision be made on their behalf. Such decisions must be made in the person’s best interests.
A best interests decision is a balancing exercise, taking into account the current and past wishes and feelings of the person involved, the views of family members and others involved in their care and any other relevant factors. There are often differences of opinion about the best interests of a person who lacks capacity.
In terms of personal welfare, if there is agreement about an individual’s best interests, it is often not necessary for the Court to be involved in decision making. However, where there is a dispute, for example there are differences between the person’s own views, those of the local authority and the person’s family, it is for the Court of Protection to step in, consider the evidence and make the decision.
The Court of Protection is often asked to make decisions about:
- Where a person lives and whether it is in their best interests to be deprived of their liberty – find out more;
- The care or medical treatment that a person receives;
- Who the person should have contact with;
- Whether the person has capacity to consent to sexual relations or enter into a marriage.
The Court of Protection is not limited to these areas and can make best interests decisions about a wide range of subjects which affect a person’s life.
Where a dispute has arisen and Court proceedings have not yet been issued, it can be possible to avoid the costs of going to Court by getting the right advice and representation early. We have experience of negotiating with local authorities, NHS bodies and other parties to proceedings to get the right outcome for our clients.
Ruth is a young woman with a moderate learning disability. She is assessed as lacking capacity to make decisions about who she has contact with and the circumstances in which contact takes place. Ruth lives in an independent supported living placement with support workers on site.
On a number of recent occasions, Ruth has returned from visits to her parents’ home in a distressed state. Allegations have been made against her parents and a safeguarding investigation is taking place. Ruth’s parents deny the allegations and do not think there needs to be any changes to the contact they have with her. Ruth’s social worker is of the view that contact between Ruth and her parents should be stopped or alternatively it should be supervised and take place away from the parents’ home. Ruth continues to express a wish to see her parents but often seems upset after visits.
An application is made to the Court of Protection for a decision to be made about Ruth’s best interests in relation to contact.
Hannah suffers a brain injury and is in receipt of life-sustaining treatment. There is a dispute between Hannah’s family and the treating team at the hospital about whether that treatment should continue. Hannah lacks capacity to make this decision for herself. The treating team at the hospital consider it to be in Hannah’s best interests for the treatment to continue but her family do not agree as they believe that she would not want to be kept alive in a minimally conscious state. The Court of Protection is asked to consider all of the evidence and make a decision as to whether to consent to the treatment on Hannah’s behalf.
When a Lasting Power of Attorney has been made, it must be registered before the attorney can start making decisions about a person’s property and affairs or health and welfare. It will be registered at the time that the attorney believes that the person who appointed them has lost capacity. Disputes can arise about whether the LPA should be registered, e.g. because another family member or the person who made the LPA believes that they still have capacity to make the decisions for themselves. In those circumstances, the Court of Protection will resolve the dispute by deciding whether it is the right time for the LPA to be registered.
When an individual already lacks capacity to make a Lasting Power of Attorney, an application can be made for the Court of Protection to appoint a deputy to make decisions on a person’s behalf in relation to their property and affairs or health and welfare. This can be non-contentious but disputes can arise about who the deputy should be, whether they are acting in a person’s best interests or whether a deputy should be appointed at all.
Where a deputy is found not to be acting in a person’s best interests, the Court of Protection can revoke the deputyship. Often, particularly in relation to health and welfare decisions, the Court will find it more appropriate to take specific decisions on the person’s behalf rather than to appoint a deputy.
There are certain limits on the powers of a deputy appointed to manage a person’s property and affairs. The deputy cannot give away substantial sums of money or make a will on the person’s behalf. In such circumstances, the Court of Protection can make a statutory will or approve a gift application.
When applications for gifts or statutory wills are made, there may be an objection, e.g. from a family member who does not believe that it is the best use of their relative’s money. If there is a dispute about such applications, the Court of Protection will consider the evidence relating to the competing views and make a decision in the person’s best interests.
Whenever the Court of Protection makes decisions, it is important for family members to be involved in proceedings as they have usually known the individual longer than anyone else. This means they often hold crucial information about the person’s long-held beliefs, values, wishes and feelings.
Our Court of Protection team has experience of acting for family members who are concerned about the decisions being made on behalf of a relative who lacks capacity. We have acted for individuals who lack capacity to instruct a solicitor. This involves taking instructions from a litigation friend, who may be a family member, advocate or the Official Solicitor.
If you would like to discuss how we can assist in Court of Protection disputes, please click here.
Request a call back
A first class service. Eilish Ferry-Kennington was excellent.
We were very pleased with the attention and service we received from Ms Turnbull. She was friendly and professional.She listened to our requirements and explained the possible options clearly and in language we could understand. The will-writing and further consultation with us was timely and efficient. The outcome met our expectations and more, and we are very grateful for the assistance we received from Ms Turnbull.
Ursula spoke at great length with me offering advice all the way. She was a great help. Not many would have been as engaging, or helpful. Contacting a solicitor can be a daunting experience but Ursula was really friendly.
Hi Julia. Thank you so much for all your efforts to help me . I have to say this would not have happened without you! You are all an amazing team and I really feel you all care !! So thankful to pat for recommending you all , she’s such a lovely lady . Our house is beautiful and we are on cloud 9! And more to the point, I’m finally rid of that bully for good! I would highly recommend you and your team to anyone! Thanks a million! JW.
I would like to say a sincere thanks to Jemma and EMG for helping me through a difficult time with a long term tenant who, through ill health was unable to carry on paying the rent and has since moved on to long term care, via the court of protection.
If Jemma hadn’t become involved and guided me through the difficult procedures to recover the arrears and regain the possession, I think we may have been struggling through without resolution for many months or even years.
I would certainly recommend Jemma and EMG to others in this position as you get the feeling that they really do care about your problems, but also in a very professional manner too.
“Thanks to Sam, I feel like a weight has been lifted off my shoulders. Thank you again for your time. I certainly will recommend you and EMG for your professionalism and your kindness.” D. Rutter
“ Jemma – I just wanted you know how grateful I am for all your help and assistance at the tribunal, also your concern and caring manner you always have for us all.”
Thank you also for Richard, 100% agree with all your past clients, he so easy to work with, keeps you updated, fast and in general made the whole process (almost; as much as can be when buying a house ?) stress free!
Paul is so pleased with all of the support you have been able to offer up during the purchase process.
He is impressed by the way that you are free to help him and talk matters through. He also commented on how happy you always sound as well.